The Launch Video Company is an X marketing and amplification agency for AI and tech startups. We make launch videos and get them seen through 5,000+ creators with 250M combined followers. Our 30 launches tracked in our Global Launch Directory have done 164M views on X between them, and we guarantee 1M, 3M or 5M views on a launch or announcement, with a pro-rated refund if we miss.
Last updated: November 9, 2026
I run one of these agencies, so I'm not neutral. But the options sell very different things, and I'd rather you pick the right one than pick us for the wrong reason.
To keep it honest, I pulled the numbers from our Global Launch Directory. It tracks 1,356 X launches from Mar 30 to Nov 8, 2026. Here's what stood out:
- Our 30 launches had a median of 2.9M views, and 23 of them crossed 1M.
- 23.5% of all launches crossed 1M views. The median got 234K.
- Launches with a 5/5 distribution score hit 1M 80.2% of the time. At 1/5, 2.2%.
- Accounts under 10K followers hit 1M 17.9% of the time.
Aarush Yadav's $1.3M raise for Subvocal, posted from an account with about 8.6K followers.
What does an X marketing agency actually do?
An X marketing agency gets your launch post in front of the right people in the first few hours. Depending on who you hire, that covers the video, the post copy, the launch date, the creators who post and quote it, or paid ads. Most agencies only do part of it, so ask which parts you're paying for.
You'll also see it sold as a Twitter marketing agency. Same work, older name.
The agencies you'll meet mostly fall into five types:
- Video plus distribution. One team makes the launch video and runs launch day. That's what we do.
- Distribution only. A network of creators posts and quotes a video you already have.
- Video-only studios. They make the film and leave reach to you.
- Paid media buyers. They put X Ads behind the post.
- General influencer agencies. Big creator rosters across platforms, often outside tech.
How do the agency types compare?
The differences that matter are who makes the video and where the views come from. Those two things decide most of what happens on launch day. Timelines, creator lists and reporting matter too, but compare these first. Here's how the five types line up, including where we're not the right fit.
| Type | Video made by | Views come from | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Launch Video Company | Our own team | Your launch post, pushed by labeled creator posts | Video and views from one team |
| Distribution only | You | Creator posts | Teams with in-house video |
| Video-only studio | The studio | Your own audience | Founders with big followings |
| Paid media buyer | You or a studio | X Ads | Retargeting after launch |
| General influencer agency | Influencers or you | Influencer audiences, often outside tech | Mass-market consumer products |
Where we're not the right fit: we're built around launches on X and LinkedIn, and we don't buy ads. If you want ads running behind the post after launch, you'll need a paid media buyer for that part.
I do think the video and the distribution should be one job. If the people writing the hook know which creators will quote it at 7am, they write a different hook.
What have our launches done on X?
Together, the 30 launches we've run that sit in our directory have done 164M views on X. That's counted on each founder's or company's launch post, read on Nov 9, 2026. The median one got 2.9M views and 23 of the 30 crossed 1M. Here are six of them, from small accounts and big ones.
| Launch | Views on X | Followers | What we did |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wispr Flow | 19.7M | 38.8K | Distribution only |
| Airtable | 14.4M | 434K | Video + distribution |
| SubQ | 13.5M | 26.2K | Video + distribution |
| Fish Audio | 13.1M | 36.2K | Video + distribution |
| Subvocal | 12.1M | 8.6K | Distribution only |
| SubQ Snap | 4.5M | 26.2K | Video + distribution |
Five of the six came from accounts under 40K followers. Wispr Flow's Notetaker launch did 19.7M views from Tanay's account, about 500 times his following.
Wispr Flow's Notetaker launch from @tankots. Wispr Flow made the video and we ran distribution.
Airtable is the other end. Howie already had a big audience. The Hyperagent launch, which came with the Founding 500 offer of $10M for 500 founders building agent-first companies, still did about 33 times his following.
Howie Liu's Hyperagent launch and Founding 500 post for Airtable. We made the video and ran launch day.
Across those 30 launches, 50% crossed 3M and a third crossed 5M. For the 1,325 launches we didn't work on, the median was 213K and 22.3% crossed 1M.
I'm biased, and founders choose to hire us, so treat that as a pattern, not an experiment.
Where do an agency's views actually come from?
From one of three places: ads bought through X, creators paid to post around the same time, or people who see the post and share it on their own. All three show up as views. Only the last one tells you the launch landed, so ask any agency what its number is made of.
- Ads are promoted posts. The views are real, but they stop when the budget does.
- Paid creator posts should carry X's paid partnership label. If an agency's creators don't use it, ask why.
- Organic spread is the reposts, the quotes and X's For You feed showing the post to people who don't follow you. Good coordination is there to start it.
How does our view guarantee work?
We guarantee 1M, 3M or 5M views on a launch or announcement, and it's measured on one post: your launch post, from the founder's or the company's account. Views on creator posts and quotes don't count toward the floor. If your launch post comes in under it, you get a pro-rated refund.
The views on that post come from two things. Our creators repost and quote it, and every creator post carries X's paid partnership label, so anyone can see which ones are paid. That puts it in front of the right people, and the organic spread does the rest: reposts, quotes and X's For You feed. We don't buy ads to hit the number.
Why I care about the guarantee: a launch day usually carries a funding announcement, a sales team waiting for inbound and investors watching the post. A number agreed before you pay changes how we plan. The creator list gets built to hit it.
How much does distribution matter compared with follower count?
A lot, in our data. Our distribution score rates the creator and network push behind each launch, and it lined up with views more than twice as closely as follower count did. But we give that score after a launch goes live, so a big launch can lift its own rating. Read it as a strong pattern, not proof.
| Score | Launches | Median views | Crossed 1M | Crossed 3M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5/5 | 126 | 2.25M | 80.2% | 43.7% |
| 4/5 | 255 | 864K | 45.1% | 12.2% |
| 3/5 | 332 | 234K | 15.1% | 2.4% |
| 2/5 | 266 | 68K | 4.1% | 1.1% |
| 1/5 | 226 | 34K | 2.2% | 0.9% |
Followers still help. Bigger accounts cross 1M more often, but not in a straight line.
| Followers | Launches | Median views | Crossed 1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 10K | 676 | 146K | 17.9% |
| 10K to 50K | 253 | 335K | 32.4% |
| 50K to 100K | 53 | 177K | 13.2% |
| 100K to 1M | 104 | 494K | 39.4% |
| 1M+ | 23 | 3.49M | 60.9% |
So a 1M guarantee means much more to a founder with 5K followers. It's about seven times what a typical launch from an account that size gets.
Subvocal is a good example. Aarush posted the $1.3M raise from an account with about 8.6K followers. X counts 12.1M views on it, roughly 1,400 times his following.
Does launch type change what you should expect?
A little. Funding announcements had the highest median of the launch types at 315K views, against 153K for feature launches and 125K for open-source releases. Category matters more. AI and ML launches crossed 1M 25.8% of the time. Developer tools managed 13.4%, with a median of 91K.
For a raise, put the investors and the mission in the first line. Subvocal's post opened with "We've raised $1.3M from YC & Afore Capital so you never have to type or speak again."
For a model release, show what it does in the first few seconds and put the numbers in the copy. SubQ's post had its 12 million token context window up top.
For a dev tool, pick creators developers already follow. A demo beats a pitch with that crowd.
For consumer AI, show it in use. B2C launches crossed 1M 33.2% of the time in our directory, against 22.1% for B2B.
What should you ask an agency before you sign?
Ask everyone the same questions, so the quotes are comparable. What are the views made of? Which creators will post? Can they show a launch from an account your size? Which post counts toward any guarantee, and what gets refunded if they miss? If the answers stay vague, the number probably isn't committed.
- How much of the view count is ads, creator posts and organic spread?
- Which creators will post, and who follows them?
- Can you show me a launch from an account my size?
- Which post counts toward the guarantee: yours, or creator posts too?
- What's refunded if you miss?
- Who's in the replies on launch day, and what will the report show afterwards?
So which type should you hire?
If you have one launch date, a small founder account and no video yet, hire one team for the video and the distribution. If you already have a strong video, distribution only can be enough. With a big following and your own video team, a studio or doing it in-house can work. Bring in paid media after launch.
That first group covers most of the seed to Series B launches we see. Only 17.9% of launches from accounts under 10K followers crossed 1M, so the distribution is usually what's missing.
If you're bigger, the maths changes. 60.9% of launches from 1M+ follower accounts crossed 1M on their own reach.
For more on picking a video partner specifically, see which X launch video agency to hire in 2026.
How did we get these numbers?
We read every published launch in our Global Launch Directory on Nov 9, 2026. That's 1,356 launch posts on X, from Mar 30 to Nov 8, 2026. Views are X's own count on the single launch post. We used medians because a few huge launches skew the averages, and ranked each signal by how closely it moved with views.
1,205 launches have a distribution score and 1,109 have a follower count. One more launch we worked on is in the directory. It's in the overall numbers but left out of the comparison between our 30 and the other 1,325. Follower counts are what X shows today, not on launch day. The directory leans toward AI and tech launches, and we choose which launches go in, so read these as benchmarks for AI and tech, not all of X. It's correlation, not causation. More in what predicts a 1M-view launch on X.
If you want the short version: work out who's carrying the post in the first hour before you worry about the video, judge any guarantee against what accounts your size usually get, and ask every agency what its views are made of.
If you're planning a launch and want a second opinion, even if you end up hiring someone else, I'm happy to look at it. Use the "Book a call" button at the top of this page.
— Subah









