AI agentB2B3M-5MGlobalSeries BFeature launchDemoUSFounder-led
TLVC Rating
4.00
Hook
Editing / Creativity
Copy
Sentiment of launch
Distribution strategy
Community Rating
No ratings yet
to rate this launch.
CodeRabbit Agent for Slack extends the company's existing AI code review product into the place where engineering teams actually coordinate work. The agent sits inside Slack channels and threads, building a persistent memory of decisions, incidents, and tribal knowledge so teammates and their AI coding tools stop relitigating the same questions every week. It connects to monitoring systems, code hosts, and issue trackers to answer questions like how many internal server errors showed up in the last day, and it surfaces and celebrates shipped work as it happens. The target user is an engineering team already leaning on autonomous coding agents that lack context about how their specific team operates.
The launch matters now because CodeRabbit already has significant distribution in code review, and Slack is the missing piece for giving agents organizational memory. CodeRabbit helps review AI-generated software code, and the startup doubled its revenue and gained over 10,000 customers after a recent funding round , which gives it a sizable installed base to roll this Slack product into. The company's internal figures cited at launch point to roughly 2 million pull requests reviewed each week across 6 million repositories, and the new agent applies that same context engine to conversations rather than diffs.
Harjot Gill is the founder and CEO of CodeRabbit , and Guritfaq Singh is his co-founder . The company is based in San Francisco and backed by CRV, among others. Teams can try the agent at coderabbit.ai/agent and install it directly into their Slack workspace.
Comments (10)
Sign in to join the discussion.
Marcus ValeApr 22, 2026
"Your engineering team is about to snap" is a wild opening line. Did a PM threaten you at standup this morning, Harjot?
Emma LindqvistApr 22, 2026
the thumbnail with the rabbit in Slack colors is chef's kiss, I'm stealing that energy for my own launch in 3 weeks
Olive GreenwayApr 22, 2026
ok wait, a bot that reads the Slack threads I've been ignoring since March? This is either a gift or an indictment.
Mike NgaiApr 22, 2026
Genuinely curious how you handle Slack's retention limits and private channel permissions. The demo glosses right past the part I actually care about.
Kofi AdebayoApr 22, 2026
Every company pitching "second brain for teams" assumes teams want a second brain. Most of them are struggling with the first one.
Priya RamanApr 22, 2026
The wedge from PR reviews into Slack context is actually the move I'd want to see here. Distribution via existing seats is underrated.
Kate RuessApr 22, 2026
Cool, now do Linear threads, Notion pages, and that one Google Doc from 2022 nobody can find. The tribal knowledge problem goes way deeper than Slack.
N
Nikhil S.Apr 22, 2026
sorry dumb question but if the knowledge is in threads nobody can find, how does the bot know which threads are the right ones?
R
Raj K.Apr 22, 2026
A team that documents nothing will not be saved by a smarter search bar.
Terry DistefanoApr 22, 2026
Interesting positioning but the tweet is doing a lot of work conflating "AI coding agent burnout" with "Slack search is bad." Those are two different products.
Work With Us
Book an intro call to explore our suite of services. We might have a waitlist.
CodeRabbit
Reviews for AI-powered teams who move fast
Reviews for AI-powered teams who move fast
Tags
TLVC Rating
Community Rating
No ratings yet
to rate this launch.
CodeRabbit Agent for Slack extends the company's existing AI code review product into the place where engineering teams actually coordinate work. The agent sits inside Slack channels and threads, building a persistent memory of decisions, incidents, and tribal knowledge so teammates and their AI coding tools stop relitigating the same questions every week. It connects to monitoring systems, code hosts, and issue trackers to answer questions like how many internal server errors showed up in the last day, and it surfaces and celebrates shipped work as it happens. The target user is an engineering team already leaning on autonomous coding agents that lack context about how their specific team operates. The launch matters now because CodeRabbit already has significant distribution in code review, and Slack is the missing piece for giving agents organizational memory. CodeRabbit helps review AI-generated software code, and the startup doubled its revenue and gained over 10,000 customers after a recent funding round , which gives it a sizable installed base to roll this Slack product into. The company's internal figures cited at launch point to roughly 2 million pull requests reviewed each week across 6 million repositories, and the new agent applies that same context engine to conversations rather than diffs. Harjot Gill is the founder and CEO of CodeRabbit , and Guritfaq Singh is his co-founder . The company is based in San Francisco and backed by CRV, among others. Teams can try the agent at coderabbit.ai/agent and install it directly into their Slack workspace.
Comments (10)
"Your engineering team is about to snap" is a wild opening line. Did a PM threaten you at standup this morning, Harjot?
the thumbnail with the rabbit in Slack colors is chef's kiss, I'm stealing that energy for my own launch in 3 weeks
ok wait, a bot that reads the Slack threads I've been ignoring since March? This is either a gift or an indictment.
Genuinely curious how you handle Slack's retention limits and private channel permissions. The demo glosses right past the part I actually care about.
Every company pitching "second brain for teams" assumes teams want a second brain. Most of them are struggling with the first one.
The wedge from PR reviews into Slack context is actually the move I'd want to see here. Distribution via existing seats is underrated.
Cool, now do Linear threads, Notion pages, and that one Google Doc from 2022 nobody can find. The tribal knowledge problem goes way deeper than Slack.
sorry dumb question but if the knowledge is in threads nobody can find, how does the bot know which threads are the right ones?
A team that documents nothing will not be saved by a smarter search bar.
Interesting positioning but the tweet is doing a lot of work conflating "AI coding agent burnout" with "Slack search is bad." Those are two different products.